<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 120Hz LCD TV - The Facts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/guides/120hz-lcd-tv/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/guides/120hz-lcd-tv</link>
	<description>Top of best LCD TVs on the market, guides, reviews and more</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 01:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: TheBestLCDTV.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/guides/120hz-lcd-tv#comment-62</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBestLCDTV.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 10:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/?p=17#comment-62</guid>
		<description>@Jason: 65 inch not big for 11 feet if you are watching 1080p. However, for 720p (most sports channels) it is a bit bigger than the recommended size for that distance. For 16 feet it is certainly not too big. If you plan to play games a lot I don't recommend a plasma TV because it can get burn-in. Unless you watch TV a lot more than you play games, a plasma could be a risky choice. You can read more about this topic in the &lt;a href="http://www.thebestplasmatv.com/guides/plasma-tv-burn-in/" title="burn in" rel="nofollow"&gt;plasma TV burn in&lt;/a&gt; guide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jason: 65 inch not big for 11 feet if you are watching 1080p. However, for 720p (most sports channels) it is a bit bigger than the recommended size for that distance. For 16 feet it is certainly not too big. If you plan to play games a lot I don&#8217;t recommend a plasma TV because it can get burn-in. Unless you watch TV a lot more than you play games, a plasma could be a risky choice. You can read more about this topic in the <a href="http://www.thebestplasmatv.com/guides/plasma-tv-burn-in/" title="burn in" rel="nofollow">plasma TV burn in</a> guide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/guides/120hz-lcd-tv#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 13:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/?p=17#comment-60</guid>
		<description>Question:  I am trying to decide between the Samsung 58" 1080p plasma (PN58A550) and the Sharp Aquos 65" LCD 60HZ (LC-65D64U).  The seating for viewing will be approx. 11.5-12.0 away, but there is a pub table that would sit about 16-18 ft away as well.  The TV is going to be used primarily for watching sports, playing video games and the occassional blu-ray/DVD.  Also, the lighting in the room is all recessed.

The TV will be used in a finished basement that will also have two 40" LCDs above it.  Yes.  That makes for 3 TVs on one wall.  I like to watch a lot of sports and/or play video games while watching games at the same time.

Do you think the Aquos would be too big for the main viewing area?  What about the video games and sports tickers effecting burn-in?

Thank you for your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Question:  I am trying to decide between the Samsung 58&#8243; 1080p plasma (PN58A550) and the Sharp Aquos 65&#8243; LCD 60HZ (LC-65D64U).  The seating for viewing will be approx. 11.5-12.0 away, but there is a pub table that would sit about 16-18 ft away as well.  The TV is going to be used primarily for watching sports, playing video games and the occassional blu-ray/DVD.  Also, the lighting in the room is all recessed.</p>
<p>The TV will be used in a finished basement that will also have two 40&#8243; LCDs above it.  Yes.  That makes for 3 TVs on one wall.  I like to watch a lot of sports and/or play video games while watching games at the same time.</p>
<p>Do you think the Aquos would be too big for the main viewing area?  What about the video games and sports tickers effecting burn-in?</p>
<p>Thank you for your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TheBestLCDTV.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/guides/120hz-lcd-tv#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>TheBestLCDTV.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:14:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/?p=17#comment-48</guid>
		<description>@Victor Ramos: Plasma TVs are better in this area. Not necessarily because of such technologies but because of their native response time which is much faster. From the two, TH-50PZ800U is better, but not necessarily because the refresh rate. It is one of the best plasma TVs. It has perfect colors (with THX certification) and superb black levels - see homepage of www.thebestplasmatv.com and reviews section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Victor Ramos: Plasma TVs are better in this area. Not necessarily because of such technologies but because of their native response time which is much faster. From the two, TH-50PZ800U is better, but not necessarily because the refresh rate. It is one of the best plasma TVs. It has perfect colors (with THX certification) and superb black levels - see homepage of <a href="http://www.thebestplasmatv.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.thebestplasmatv.com</a> and reviews section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor Ramos</title>
		<link>http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/guides/120hz-lcd-tv#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor Ramos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 03:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thebestlcdtv.com/?p=17#comment-47</guid>
		<description>My question refers to the 480 Hz Sub-field Drive Technology  in a Plasma Panasonic vs. 120Hz in a LCD which is better? How does the 480 Hz  Sub-field Drive Technology in the TH-50PZ800U compare to the 60Hz TH-50PZ80U?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My question refers to the 480 Hz Sub-field Drive Technology  in a Plasma Panasonic vs. 120Hz in a LCD which is better? How does the 480 Hz  Sub-field Drive Technology in the TH-50PZ800U compare to the 60Hz TH-50PZ80U?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.188 seconds -->
